Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attempt to fix snap build #12882

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

Attempt to fix snap build #12882

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

quexten
Copy link
Contributor

@quexten quexten commented Jan 15, 2025

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-17137

📔 Objective

Snapcraft requires special packing using the snapcraft cli instead of directly creating the image. The latter works for local snap installations but not for snapcraft.

This is a change to the pack:lin step that was originally introduced in #12187.

📸 Screenshots

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details958514ee-1c6d-42f6-ad2e-52a1d042afce

Fixed Issues (1)

Great job! The following issues were fixed in this Pull Request

Severity Issue Source File / Package
MEDIUM Client_Privacy_Violation /bitwarden_license/bit-web/src/app/tools/access-intelligence/org-at-risk-apps-dialog.component.html: 15

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 34.34%. Comparing base (8e95029) to head (5545515).
Report is 36 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #12882      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   34.29%   34.34%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files        2934     2965      +31     
  Lines       90216    90533     +317     
  Branches    16943    16977      +34     
==========================================
+ Hits        30937    31094     +157     
- Misses      56815    56975     +160     
  Partials     2464     2464              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@quexten quexten marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2025 20:37
@quexten quexten merged commit ca420d7 into main Jan 16, 2025
48 checks passed
@quexten quexten deleted the test-snap branch January 16, 2025 10:02
quexten added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2025
* Attempt to fix snap build

* Move snap

* Add debug logging

* Fix move

* Remove debug logs

(cherry picked from commit ca420d7)
quexten added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2025
* Attempt to fix snap build

* Move snap

* Add debug logging

* Fix move

* Remove debug logs

(cherry picked from commit ca420d7)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants